[QGIS-Developer] Find unmaintained plugins
Paolo Cavallini
cavallini at faunalia.it
Fri Feb 1 23:30:22 PST 2019
Thanks for your offer of help. I agree that the mail should be sent only
for plugins not updated in the last (3? 6? 9?) months.
Could you please start filling up a ticket on
https://issues.qgis.org/issues
so we can define specs resulting from this thread and start implementing it?
Cheers.
On 01/02/19 22:40, Thomas Baumann wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> sounds like a good idea to send a reminder once a year to the maintainer
> and mark plugins as unmaintained if no feedback is received.
>
> I am available to help implementing it.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
>
> Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 19:01 hat Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it
> <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> geschrieben:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 01/02/19 13:53, Thomas Baumann wrote:
>
> > I made the experience that there are QGIS-plugins which are not
> > maintained anymore.
> > Example:
> >
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-Rectangles-Ovals-Digitizing-plugin-deprecated-td5366686.html
> >
> > Recently I asked some maintainers if they have plans to update their
> > plugins to be QGIS3-ready because I was willing to update them if the
> > maintainer wouldn't do it... but again I got the impression that some
> > plugins are not maintained anymore.
> > Example:
> > https://github.com/NathanW2/selection-sets/issues/5
> >
> > Now that there is the change from QGIS2 to QGIS3 some unmaintained
> > plugins will just dissapear like through a "natural selection". But in
> > one or two years there could again be lots of unmaintained plugins
> which
> > could have bugs that slow down qgis or make them unstable like it
> > happened with the Rectangles-Ovals-Digitizing-plugin (
> > https://github.com/vinayan/RectOvalDigitPlugin/issues/6 ).
> >
> > Wouldn't it make sense to check once a year if all plugins are still
> > maintained?
> >
> > You could for example use something like LimeSurvey (
> > https://www.limesurvey.org/community ) and ask every maintainer to
> > respond if they still feel responsible for the plugin. In the
> backend of
> > Limesurvey you have a database with the responses so it should be
> quite
> > easy to automatically synchronize the results with your
> repository-items.
> > This way the unmaintained plugins could be marked as deprecated if no
> > response is sent back.
>
> thanks a lot for your suggestion. I agree that the move to QGIS 3
> automatically purges old unmaintained code, but this does not solve
> entirely the issue.
> In short do you suggest we should run a survey once a year, sending it
> to the list of plugin maintainers, and marking as deprecated all plugins
> for which we do not receive a positive response?
> I would be a bit skeptical, as many plugins are still useful even if not
> actively maintained. An alternative would be to add to our Django app an
> automatic reminder to be sent to maintainer, asking to confirm they
> maintenance; in absence of a feedback, we could mark it as unmaintained,
> and make this visible to users, so they have the options of adopting it,
> supporting it, or stopping using it before it actually stops working.
> How does it sound? in case you agree on this or a modified version of
> it, would you be available to help implementing this?
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu>
> QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> Chair:
> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS.ORG Chair:
http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list