[QGIS-Developer] QGIS 2.18 EOL approaching?

[Uros Preloznik]

Hi,

I wish to point to couple of issues regarding WFS for latest QGIS Server
that I think need to be fixed before it can be ready for production (next
LTR):

1. DescribeFeatureType not following TYPENAME parameter
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20198

2. Can't reset numeric field using WFS Update
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20961

3. WFS issue using the EXP_FILTER parameter
https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20927


best regards,
Uroš
http://level2.si


V V pet., 28. dec. 2018 ob 18:12 je oseba Paolo Cavallini <
cavallini at faunalia.it> napisala:

> Hi Régis,
>
> On 28/12/18 17:48, Régis Haubourg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry to be late. Can anyone point me to the issues of QGIS server
> > making you say it is not ready for production?
> >
> > OGC tests are running every night and work fine. I see only one issue
> > with high priority affecting QGIS > 3.0 versions.
>
> In fact I see only 61 issues:
> https://issues.qgis.org/projects/qgis/issues?category_id=49
> of which only 20 apply to 3.*. Régis, could you please have a look and
> close the obsolete ones (there are even 6 pre 2.18)? Do you see any
> blocker on the list?
> So apparently it is in a good shape. The main issue therefore moves to
> the clients: which ones are ready for QGIS 3? What is the expected
> release time for a Q3-savy version? It would be great if at least the
> most popular ones would be rady by the 2.18 EOL.
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS.ORG Chair:
> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20190110/be430be5/attachment.html>