[QGIS-Developer] Post github issues migration clean ups - some proposals

[Nyall Dawson]

On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 09:06, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Once again, many many thanks to the individuals behind the the recent
> issues migration. Fantastic job all round!
>
> I'd like to do some post-migration cleanups, but would like wider
> opinions on how to handle these:
>
> - We have two labels "bug" and "bug fix" which apply to issues and
> pull requests respectively. Can we combine these, and just use "bug"
> for bug fixing PRs? (There's a LOT of labels now)

Done

>
> - "Database" label: should this be renamed "db manager", to
> disambiguate from postgis/spatialite/etc issues, which instead belong
> under "data providers"?

Done

>
> - Can "CAD" be merged into "Digitising"? There's only a handful of
> open issues, and I don't think it warrants a separate category. In
> QGIS these two concepts are basically merged now anyway.

Based on discussion, I've renamed this to DXF/DWG for clarification

> - "Easy fix". Does anyone actually use this? Many of these are not
> "easy fixes" -- e.g. I've been chipping away at
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/28195 since last year... it's
> probably about the hardest fix I've ever done in QGIS. No idea how
> this one gained the label!

Ok, seems there's a strong argument to leave this in place!

Nyall