[QGIS-Developer] LTR management [was Re: Delaying 3.10.1?]
Matthias Kuhn
matthias at opengis.ch
Thu Nov 28 00:02:03 PST 2019
Hi all,
I enjoy reading the discussion on this tricky topic. Thank you for
looking into this!
What would be the precise plan of action?
The situation is, a new QGIS 3.4.13 release based on gdal3/proj6 is out
already. We cannot make that undone unless we get out the message to
forget that 3.4.13 ever existed and ask everyone to reinstall 3.4.12.
I wonder if it wouldn't be easier to setup a system somewhere to build
with the old gdal and proj libraries to create the remaining standalone
installers to push out the remaining three 3.4 releases (manually). With
LTR we have built a brand with a very good reputation and I think we
should protect this label and avoid any controversial communication if
reasonably possible.
It's possible that I am underestimating the work which would be required
to do this, but in my opinion this would be a good opportunity to do an
ad-hoc investment into Jürgen (given that he has some of his precious
time left to actually work on this and that he does not completely
disagree with me).
Best regards
Matthias
On 11/28/19 1:47 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote:
> Just have to make sure we communicate this via the blog and why.
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 10:38 AM Mathieu Pellerin
> <nirvn.asia at gmail.com <mailto:nirvn.asia at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1 to end 3.4 cycle a few months early too.
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019, 05:57 Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo at gmail.com
> <mailto:madmanwoo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> +1 on dropping support early as the risk is large on breaking
> the users experience with a LTR
>
> On Thu., 28 Nov. 2019, 8:55 am Even Rouault,
> <even.rouault at spatialys.com
> <mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>> wrote:
>
> > I think the issues are deeper then the
> crashes/projection failures
> > fixed by the GDAL/proj cherry-picked commits.
>
> Yes, actually QGIS 3.4 should not be affected by the PROJ
> fix, because it
> uses the old pj_transform() API with doesn't trigger that
> code path at all.
> But it *is* affected by exportToProj4() no longer
> returning +datum or +towgs84
> in cases where it used to be, which basically makes
> working with anything !=
> WGS 84 fundamentaly broken. The only "fix" would be to
> backport the fully
> fledged PROJ 6 support of 3.10 which is obviously
> unreasonable to do in 3.4
>
> > think we SHOULD drop
> > Windows LTR support early rather than releasing a 3.4
> build based on
> > proj6/gdal3.
>
> +1
>
> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> List info:
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org>
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20191128/41ed9e1d/attachment.html>
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list