[QGIS-Developer] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?

[Mathieu Pellerin]

If packaging a brand new release is "faster" and "simpler" than updating
our website, there's something to improve there ;-P

We should have a clear procedure to allow for designated person(s) to be
able to swiftly revert a release on the website (manual edits if need be).

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:23 PM Andrea Giudiceandrea <andreaerdna at libero.it>
wrote:

> Il 15/11/2021 20:57, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:
>
> > So what do we do? I can think of a few responses we could make:
> >
> > - Kill 3.16.13 with fire. It needs to be removed from the website and
> > all traces of the internet ASAP. Rollback to only offering 3.16.11,
> > which is the last good Windows 3.16 release.
>
> I think the faster and simplest thing to do is to offer QGIS LTR
> installers from the old (v1) OSGeo4W repository ("continued with
> previous dependencies") and avoid to recommend the QGIS LTR installers
> from the new (v2) OSGeo4W (as it is now in the qgis.org download page).
>
> AFAIK, the OSGeo4W v1 QGIS LTR 3.16.12 didn't suffer from the SIP issue
> nor the OSGeo4W v1 QGIS LTR 3.16.13 suffers from the CRS issue.
>
> Regards.
>
> Andrea
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20211116/778ea90d/attachment.html>