[QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?
Bo Victor Thomsen
bo.victor.thomsen at gmail.com
Wed Nov 17 10:45:49 PST 2021
Hi list -
I've summed up some ideas about have to handle the LTR situation. The
policies is not carved in stone or complete but suggestions for a more
stable regime regarding LTR (and they have probably already been
mentioned sometimes by someones before)
However - Policy for LTR releases:
* At most one LTR release for every year.
* Point releases for LTR every 2 or 3 months.
* Point releases for LTR contains only security or bug patches. Never
introduce new functionality or change in the user interface (
Translation files might be exempted from this rule)
* The supporting libraries ( qt, proj, gdal, ogr etc. ) is covered by
the same rules. Only security or bug patches, never introduce newer
major versions.
* Major changes in supporting libraries for non-LTR releases is
restricted to the release just after a LTR. Thus there will be 3 or
more non-LTR releases to stabilize QGIS before next LTR.
The general idea is that the QGIS release following a LTR is a "Big
Bang" release: Everything goes.
The following non-LTR releases can introduce new functionality but no
changes in the supporting libraries (This rule could maybe be bend a
little) . But when you come around to the LTR release you deep-freeze
any changes except security- and bug correcting patches
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards
Bo Victor Thomsen
Den 17-11-2021 kl. 08:27 skrev Luca Manganelli:
> > [... ]
>
> As an IT administrator in our public organization, I confess that I
> have packaged and distributed to all PCs the (old) 3.16.4 version.
> Why? Because with this version there are 0 problems among users and
> with our customized plugins.
>
> Before the 3.16 release, the other 3.x versions were a disaster, many
> things didn't work, so before this 3.16, I had distributed 2.x to many
> users and 3.12 to only few PCs.
>
> In a big organization the most important thing is not, "strangely",
> the more features a piece of a software has, but the ... stability.
> Remember that every worker wants a product that... works.
>
> And, the upgrade. The QGIS package is big (the archive is over 320MB)
> and we have many offices in sloooow networks (2M ADSL... don't laugh,
> this is the situ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Comune di Trento
>
> via Belenzani, 19 - 38122 Trento | C.F e P. IVA: 00355870221
>
> tel. +39 0461.884111 | www.comune.trento.it <http://www.comune.trento.it>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20211117/da444f4a/attachment.html>
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list