[QGIS-Developer] Qgis server: terrible performance with Qgis 3.26
Even Rouault
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Mon Jun 20 09:55:37 PDT 2022
Use sysprof or just run under a debugger and interrupt regularly should
help you spot in which method(s) most time is spent
Le 20/06/2022 à 18:48, David Marteau via QGIS-Developer a écrit :
>
> I used the following test:
>
> readflags = Qgis.ProjectReadFlags() readflags |=
> Qgis.ProjectReadFlag.TrustLayerMetadata|Qgis.ProjectReadFlag.DontLoad3DViews|Qgis.ProjectReadFlag.DontLoadProjectStyles
> prj = QgsProject()%timeit -n 1
> prj.read(f"{datapath}/france_parts3_26.qgs",readflags)
>
> 105 ms ± 18.5 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
>
> This improve the result but we are still much higher that the loading
> time of 3.24: 15ms compared to 105ms
>
>
> Le 20/06/2022 à 18:38, Nyall Dawson a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 20 June 2022, 11:42 pm David Marteau, <dmarteau at 3liz.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > You should set the other new read optimisation flags here --
>> see
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/88ebb3f2f513dbce5a775f50e51ea0117f859c65/src/core/qgis.h#L1962
>>
>> These are already available also in 3.24 and we use the
>> `TrustLayerMetadata` in the above test. For server, the other
>> flags are not applicable (Getprint requests need print layouts ).
>>
>> So that mean we are comparing 3.24 to 3.26 with same level of
>> read optimisation and that does not change the fact that, for
>> that very same level of read optimisation, project's loading is
>> incredibly slower in 3.26.
>>
>>
>> You'll need to set the new flags relating to skipping the 3d views
>> and project style loading in order to compare properly. Neither of
>> those things were occurring in 3.24, and both have an associated
>> cost. And neither are relevant for server.
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 20/06/2022 à 15:10, Nyall Dawson a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 20 June 2022, 9:37 pm David Marteau via QGIS-Developer,
>>> <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have noticed a huge drop of performance while testing Qgis
>>> server with Qgis 3.26, from 10x to 30x slower as usual.
>>>
>>> Trying to reduce the problem I have found a huge increase of
>>> time spend reading the project in 3.26 compared to 3.24.
>>>
>>> Here some benchmark with very simple project from the test
>>> data set. Note: the project has been updated with qgis 3.26:
>>>
>>> Qgis 3.24:
>>> ======
>>>
>>> readflags = QgsProject.ReadFlags()readflags |=
>>> QgsProject.FlagTrustLayerMetadata
>>>
>>> prj = QgsProject()
>>>
>>> %timeit -n 1 prj.read(f"{datapath}/france_parts.qgs",readflags)
>>>
>>> > 15.7 ms ± 205 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
>>>
>>> Qgis 3.26:
>>> ======
>>>
>>> readflags = QgsProject.ReadFlags() readflags |=
>>> QgsProject.FlagTrustLayerMetadata
>>>
>>>
>>> You should set the other new read optimisation flags here -- see
>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/88ebb3f2f513dbce5a775f50e51ea0117f859c65/src/core/qgis.h#L1962
>>>
>>> Nyall
>>>
>>> prj = QgsProject()
>>>
>>> %timeit -n 1 prj.read(f"{datapath}/france_parts.qgs",readflags)
>>>
>>> 195 ms ± 44 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
>>>
>>> There is a factor x10 between Qgis 3.24 et Qgis 3.26 for the
>>> exact same project.
>>> This has serious impact on requests: landing page catalog
>>> request time increased from approximatevely 110ms to more
>>> than 3.0s with our test data set.
>>>
>>>
>>> David Marteau
>>> www.3liz.com <http://www.3liz.com>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info:
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20220620/98eb69ad/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the QGIS-Developer
mailing list