[QGIS-Developer] SAGA GIS plugin maintenance

[Stefano Campus]

If I’m not mistaken, over the years, the SAGA maintainers haven’t paid much
attention to integration with QGIS; proof of this is that they’ve changed
the structure of the modules, renamed them, and so on, without making any
announcement or contacting the QGIS maintainers in any way

Il giorno gio 21 mag 2026 alle ore 11:53 <
qgis-developer-request at lists.osgeo.org> ha scritto:

>
> *Bas Couwenberg* sebastic at xs4all.nl
> <qgis-developer%40lists.osgeo.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BQGIS-Developer%5D%20SAGA%20GIS%20plugin%20maintenance&In-Reply-To=%3Ce4d5973f-3ab3-4993-8e73-8e3a8a6ec88f%40xs4all.nl%3E>
> *Thu May 21 03:40:36 PDT 2026*
>
>
>    - Previous message (by thread): [QGIS-Developer] SAGA GIS plugin
>    maintenance
>    <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-May/068253.html>
>    - *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
>    <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-May/date.html#68254>
>     [ thread ]
>    <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-May/thread.html#68254>
>     [ subject ]
>    <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-May/subject.html#68254>
>     [ author ]
>    <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2026-May/author.html#68254>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> On 5/21/26 11:53 AM, Stefano Campus via QGIS-Developer wrote:
> >* Do you think it would be a good idea to propose to the Steering Group that
> *>* its maintenance be taken on directly by the QGIS.org Foundation and that a
> *>* certain sum (1000–2000 euros?) be set aside in the annual budget for its
> *>* maintenance?
> *
> No, I think it makes more sense for the SAGA developers to commit to maintaining the QGIS plugin which will likely motivate them to stabilize their interface.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20260521/09b3e0a7/attachment.htm>