[Qgis-psc] Criteria fro HF refunding

[Anita Graser]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Hi all.
> Our next HF is approaching, and I think time is ripe to take a clear
> decision about what to refund to whom.
> My idea (which we have mostly followed until now):
>
> * food and refreshments should be free for all participants
> * flights and hotel should be covered for core team only
> * uncertain about the dinner(s) out - whether to offer them to
> everybody, or only to core team
> * everybody is encouraged to support the HF by paying they own expenses,
> if they have their own funding.
>
> The weak point is how to define core team: PSC+committers? Also
> documentors? Also infrastructure maintainer? Anyone who contributed at
> least x lines of code? Should we rely on ad hoc application, one per
> each HF, or have a list of those who can be reimbursed, with a formal
> (even if very simple) procedure for being admitted?
>

​The advantage of a short application for each HF is that we would have a
better estimate of how many people will receive refunds while we would not
have in case of a list where some people might not come or not need support
at one time or another.

Best wishes,
Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20150212/01542722/attachment.html>