[Qgis-psc] HF refunds

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Wed Mar 18 12:58:29 PDT 2015


On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> Il 18/03/2015 07:28, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>
> > ​So for me th​e proposed change seems more vague rather than more
> explicit.
>
> thanks for the comments. My idea was indeed to simplify the procedure,
> that appeared too bureaucratic, and frankly we did not have the time to
> adhere to. At the same time, the proposed changes make it more explicit
> the crucial point (acceptance or denial).
> I agree on adding the email address for application.
> I think most requests do not need consultation anyway (core devs, psc
> members), so the limit of 200 € is not very useful IMHO.
> I'd appreciate more comments, then  can prepare a revised version.
>

​I agree that the 200€ limit is kind of arbitrary. The PSC will most likely
have to decide on a couple of requests anyway. One more or less < 200€
won't make a big difference. Better to have the PSC stand behind these
kinds of decisions imho.

Best wishes,
Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20150318/33061729/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list