[Qgis-psc] MIgration to Py3: contacting plugin authors?

[Nathan Woodrow]

IMO continue as we have been. The email is there for contact reasons or
else we wouldn't ask for it.

- Nathan

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Il 11/11/2015 10:16, Anita Graser ha scritto:
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2015 8:59 AM, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavallini at faunalia.it
> > <mailto:cavallini at faunalia.it>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Il 10/11/2015 10:33, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
> >>
> >> > I think you are fine.  That is the point of the email address in the
> end
> >> > anyway otherwise we wouldn't ask.  In the end I think people don't
> >> > really mind if it's not spam so I think it's fine.
> >> >
> >> > So I wouldn't stop doing that if we need to contact authors.
> >>
> >> Thanks again for this, Nathan.
> >> Can the PSC please take a position on this?
> >
> > Can you please summarize the motion we should vote on? You mentioned two
> > options in the previous mail. Which do you want to vote on?
>
> The previous one was on the possibility of creating a mailing list.
> The current one is about the possibility for the plugin administrator to
> contact authors individually in order to solve issues before publishing it.
> The options are:
> * continue as it is
> * asking permission to authors to be contacted.
> Thanks Anita for helping clarifying it.
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20151111/0cff6002/attachment.html>