[Qgis-psc] outstanding issues

Anita Graser anitagraser at gmx.at
Sat Nov 21 11:19:30 PST 2015


On Nov 21, 2015 5:07 PM, "Paolo Cavallini" <cavallini at faunalia.it> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Il 20/11/2015 18:44, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> > Folks can I ask that we move the thread back to the practical issues of
> > plotting a roadmap to solving our FTools issues rather than pursuing
> > this avenue which is a dead-end in terms of getting a usable FTools into
> > the hands of our users.
>
> I think the best we can do now is do do a minimal fix of broken tools,
> spending as little as possible, relying as much as possible on geos7ogr,
> waiting for a more solid approach.
> I'm still unsure we should replicate existing code: the problems have
> been solved over and over in similar code (the closest being saga, also
> C++), and redoing things instead of reusing and integrating them does
> not sound right to me. I believe the approach we took with GDALTools was
> more efficient.

E.g.
Ftools dissolve would be a good candidate to be replaced by OGR dissolve
which we already have in processing.

Best wishes
Anita

> All the best.
>
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20151121/d0cd509c/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list