[Qgis-psc] Voting on revised charter

[Neumann, Andreas]

Hi, 

I understand your feelings. 

But how can we represent the project if the community never voted on us
as being their representatives? 

At some point you need to bootstrap the whole thing. I don't think it is
an option just to continue as before. It is not democratic. 

Next year it will be easier. 

We just have to get it started. 

I wouldn't fear such a voting. All of us did a good job on behalf of
QGIS.ORG. Why shouldn't we be elected? 

Andreas 

On 2016-11-25 09:05, Paolo Cavallini wrote:

> Il 25/11/2016 09:01, Richard Duivenvoorde ha scritto:
> 
>> I'm not too keen on too much bureaucracy in PSC/association work.
>> I would be fine with the bootstrapping process of Tim.
>> 
>> And do not underestimate peoples feelings when they are not relected:
>> (I'm not sure I would be happy to mentor somebody who just kicked me
>> out...)
> 
> Very sensible words, Richard. I'm also looking with some preoccupation
> to this increasing bureaucracy: I understand it's a necessity, and
> generally a good move towards maturity, but IMHO we should strive to
> keep it at a minimum, not the least to be more readily understandable
> from outside the inner circle (and even sometimes from within it).
> All the best.

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20161125/30c9862a/attachment.html>