[Qgis-psc] The inevitable question: extending freeze for 3.0?

Paolo Cavallini cavallini at faunalia.it
Fri Jul 7 06:32:02 PDT 2017


Il 7 luglio 2017 15:56:07 EEST, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> ha scritto:
>Hi PSC,
>
>There's a lot of major work still outstanding which would be good to
>land in 3.0, and which is actively being worked on by developers. This
>includes my layout work, the ongoing processing changes (although
>these are nearly complete - more on that later), Lutra's 3d work, the
>recently funded remaining server improvements, and Nathan's
>configuration/profiles work (+ ideally the ongoing metadata work, if
>someone steps up to fund the remaining work packages).
>
>Given that the freeze is coming up quickly, I'd like to raise the
>discussion now about whether we could/should push this back by a
>month.
>
>My personal situation is that while I should be able to complete the
>layout work and the processing changes by the current freeze, an extra
>month would allow me time to really make these improvements shine
>(especially processing would benefit from an extra month to port all
>the existing algorithms... but that's another discussion I'll raise
>soon).
>
>Is this possible? A good idea? A bad idea? Desired by anyone else but
>me?
>
>Nyall
>_______________________________________________
>Qgis-psc mailing list
>Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

IMHO this is a reasonable request, and benefits outweigh costs.
Thanks Nyall for raising it.
-- 
Sent from mobile. Sorry for being short
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20170707/86776980/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list