[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server
Paul Blottiere
paul.blottiere at oslandia.com
Mon Aug 20 02:52:33 PDT 2018
Dear PSC,
Performance and OGC reports (for WMS 1.3.0 and WFS 1.1.0) are now
generated daily on the new server qgis4.qgis.org. Everything is
available on http://test.qgis.org/.
A PR is ongoing to update the Website in order to point to these reports
(https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/546).
Thank you, all those who have helped in this!
Regards.
Paul
On 09/07/18 21:14, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Sounds good.
>
> Richard - could you please order the
>
> EX41S-SSD
> Line-Matrix
> Intel® Core™ i7-6700 Quad-Core
> CPU-B 10032
> RAM: 64 GB DDR4
> SSD: 2x 240 GB SATA 6 Gb/s SSD
>
> on behalf of the project?
>
> After ordering and setting it up, can you please inform how he can
> access the server?
>
> Thanks a lot to the two of you!
>
> Andreas
>
> On 9 July 2018 at 18:17, Paul Blottiere <paul.blottiere at oslandia.com
> <mailto:paul.blottiere at oslandia.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
>
>> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual
>> one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>
>> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>> <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>> server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>> <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>
>> Please let us know which one you would choose
>>
>
> Considering that performance tests have to be executed without any
> interferences, I think that a dedicated server would be more suitable.
>
> From what I saw on https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
> <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/>, I think that
> EX41S-SSD is good enough (64 GB RAM, Core i7, 2x240GB SSD).
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> On 09/07/18 08:48, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>
>> Yes - we can rent it any time on Hetzner, if you are ready.
>>
>> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual
>> one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>
>> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>> <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>> server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>> <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>
>> Please let us know which one you would chooses.
>>
>> @Richard: once Paul lets us know what he wants, could you two get
>> in touch about setting it up and integrating it with the rest of
>> our infrastructure at Hetzner?
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On 2018-07-09 09:35, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>
>>> Dear PSC,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>
>>>> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>> further on this?
>>>
>>>
>>> Doyou haveany news about the server?
>>>
>>>
>>> Have a good day.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>> Hello PSC,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>
>>>> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>> further on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>, but
>>>> finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
>>>> harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>
>>>> infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
>>>> shoulders
>>>>
>>>> I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
>>>> motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
>>>> what sponsoring level this would equate to.
>>>> we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
>>>> of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
>>>>
>>>> It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>
>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>> <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>
>>>> Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
>>>> from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we
>>>> should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
>>>> some confusion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
>>>> mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>>>>> Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, thanks!
>>>>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>> <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>
>>>>> Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
>>>>> latest test.
>>>>>
>>>>> See: http://tests.qgis.org/
>>>>> and
>>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/ <http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/>
>>>>> I will add test.qgis.org <http://test.qgis.org> to the https://certificate next round.
>>>>>
>>>>> Although... tests.qgis.org <http://tests.qgis.org> was a temporary solution, do others think it
>>>>> earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests <http://qgis.org/tests> to it?
>>>>>
>>>>> My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
>>>>> - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
>>>>> tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
>>>>> both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>>>>>
>>>>> Volunteers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>>>>>> Richard,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>>>>>> saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>>>>>> sunday via a cron job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Y.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180820/eaeedf23/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list