[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server

Tue Aug 21 23:08:33 PDT 2018

Merci Paul, very good stuff!

Results of performances are not really encouraging, is there an
explanation for this? Anyone has plans to work to improve them?

All the best.

On 08/20/2018 11:52 AM, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>
> Dear PSC,
>
>
> Performance and OGC reports (for WMS 1.3.0 and WFS 1.1.0) are now
> generated daily on the new server qgis4.qgis.org. Everything is
> available on http://test.qgis.org/.
>
>
> A PR is ongoing to update the Website in order to point to these
> reports (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/546).
>
>
> Thank you, all those who have helped in this!
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On 09/07/18 21:14, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> Richard - could you please order the
>>
>> EX41S-SSD
>> Line-Matrix
>> Intel® Core™ i7-6700 Quad-Core
>> CPU-B 10032
>> RAM: 64 GB DDR4
>> SSD: 2x 240 GB SATA 6 Gb/s SSD
>>
>> on behalf of the project?
>>
>> After ordering and setting it up, can you please inform how he can
>> access the server?
>>
>> Thanks a lot to the two of you!
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On 9 July 2018 at 18:17, Paul Blottiere <paul.blottiere at oslandia.com
>> <mailto:paul.blottiere at oslandia.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Andreas,
>>
>>
>>>     @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual
>>>     one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>>
>>>     See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>>>     server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>>
>>>     Please let us know which one you would choose
>>>
>>
>>     Considering that performance tests have to be executed without
>>     any interferences, I think that a dedicated server would be more
>>     suitable.
>>
>>     From what I saw on https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/>, I think that
>>     EX41S-SSD is good enough (64 GB RAM, Core i7, 2x240GB SSD).
>>
>>
>>     Thanks!
>>
>>     Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 09/07/18 08:48, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>
>>>     Yes - we can rent it any time on Hetzner, if you are ready.
>>>
>>>     @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a virtual
>>>     one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>>
>>>     See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>>>     server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>>
>>>     Please let us know which one you would chooses.
>>>
>>>     @Richard: once Paul lets us know what he wants, could you two
>>>     get in touch about setting it up and integrating it with the
>>>     rest of our infrastructure at Hetzner?
>>>
>>>     Thanks a lot,
>>>
>>>     Andreas
>>>
>>>     On 2018-07-09 09:35, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>
>>>>     Dear PSC,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>         I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>>>         Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>>>     further on this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Doyou haveany news about the server?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Have a good day.
>>>>
>>>>     Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>>>     Hello PSC,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>>>         Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>>>     further on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>, but
>>>>>         finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
>>>>>         harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>
>>>>>         infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
>>>>>         shoulders
>>>>>
>>>>>     I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
>>>>>     motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).   
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
>>>>>         what sponsoring level this would equate to.
>>>>>         we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
>>>>>         of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
>>>>>
>>>>>     It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>
>>>>>         http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>>         <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
>>>>>     from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we 
>>>>>     should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
>>>>>     some confusion.
>>>>>      
>>>>>
>>>>>     Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
>>>>>     mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>>>>>>     Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Ok, thanks!
>>>>>>     Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>>>     <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
>>>>>>     latest test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     See: http://tests.qgis.org/
>>>>>>     and
>>>>>>     http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/ <http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/>
>>>>>>     I will add test.qgis.org <http://test.qgis.org> to the https://certificate next round.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Although... tests.qgis.org <http://tests.qgis.org> was a temporary solution, do others think it
>>>>>>     earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests <http://qgis.org/tests> to it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
>>>>>>     - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
>>>>>>     tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
>>>>>>     both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Volunteers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Richard Duivenvoorde
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>>>>>>>     Richard,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>>>>>>>     saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>>>>>>>     sunday via a cron job.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Y.
>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Neumann
>> QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> board member (treasurer)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180822/afa88200/attachment.html>