[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server

pblottiere paul.blottiere at oslandia.com
Wed Aug 22 00:08:01 PDT 2018


Hello Paolo,


> Anyone has plans to work to improve them?

Yes, it's my next step over the coming weeks.


Regards.

Paul



On 08/22/2018 08:08 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>
> Merci Paul, very good stuff!
>
> Results of performances are not really encouraging, is there an
> explanation for this? Anyone has plans to work to improve them?
>
> All the best.
>
>
> On 08/20/2018 11:52 AM, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>
>> Dear PSC,
>>
>>
>> Performance and OGC reports (for WMS 1.3.0 and WFS 1.1.0) are now
>> generated daily on the new server qgis4.qgis.org. Everything is
>> available on http://test.qgis.org/.
>>
>>
>> A PR is ongoing to update the Website in order to point to these
>> reports (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/546).
>>
>>
>> Thank you, all those who have helped in this!
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/07/18 21:14, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>> Sounds good.
>>>
>>> Richard - could you please order the
>>>
>>> EX41S-SSD
>>> Line-Matrix
>>> Intel® Core™ i7-6700 Quad-Core
>>> CPU-B 10032
>>> RAM: 64 GB DDR4
>>> SSD: 2x 240 GB SATA 6 Gb/s SSD
>>>
>>> on behalf of the project?
>>>
>>> After ordering and setting it up, can you please inform how he can
>>> access the server?
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot to the two of you!
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On 9 July 2018 at 18:17, Paul Blottiere <paul.blottiere at oslandia.com
>>> <mailto:paul.blottiere at oslandia.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>>
>>>>     @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a
>>>>     virtual one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>>>
>>>>     See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>>>>     server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>>>
>>>>     Please let us know which one you would choose
>>>>
>>>
>>>     Considering that performance tests have to be executed without
>>>     any interferences, I think that a dedicated server would be more
>>>     suitable.
>>>
>>>     From what I saw on https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/>, I think that
>>>     EX41S-SSD is good enough (64 GB RAM, Core i7, 2x240GB SSD).
>>>
>>>
>>>     Thanks!
>>>
>>>     Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 09/07/18 08:48, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Yes - we can rent it any time on Hetzner, if you are ready.
>>>>
>>>>     @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a
>>>>     virtual one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>>>
>>>>     See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>>>>     server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>>>>     <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>>>
>>>>     Please let us know which one you would chooses.
>>>>
>>>>     @Richard: once Paul lets us know what he wants, could you two
>>>>     get in touch about setting it up and integrating it with the
>>>>     rest of our infrastructure at Hetzner?
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks a lot,
>>>>
>>>>     Andreas
>>>>
>>>>     On 2018-07-09 09:35, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>     Dear PSC,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>         I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>>>>         Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>>>>     further on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Doyou haveany news about the server?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Have a good day.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>>>>     Hello PSC,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>>>>         Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>>>>     further on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>, but
>>>>>>         finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
>>>>>>         harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>
>>>>>>         infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
>>>>>>         shoulders
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
>>>>>>     motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).   
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
>>>>>>         what sponsoring level this would equate to.
>>>>>>         we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
>>>>>>         of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>>>         <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
>>>>>>     from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we 
>>>>>>     should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
>>>>>>     some confusion.
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
>>>>>>     mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>>>>>>>     Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Ok, thanks!
>>>>>>>     Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>>>>     <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
>>>>>>>     latest test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     See: http://tests.qgis.org/
>>>>>>>     and
>>>>>>>     http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/
>>>>>>>     <http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/>
>>>>>>>     I will add test.qgis.org <http://test.qgis.org> to the https://certificate next round.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Although... tests.qgis.org <http://tests.qgis.org> was a temporary solution, do others think it
>>>>>>>     earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests <http://qgis.org/tests> to it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
>>>>>>>     - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
>>>>>>>     tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
>>>>>>>     both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Volunteers?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Richard Duivenvoorde
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>>>>>>>>     Richard,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>>>>>>>>     saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>>>>>>>>     sunday via a cron job.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Y.
>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>     <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Neumann
>>> QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> board member (treasurer)
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
> -- 
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180822/7a8da656/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list