[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server
Paolo Cavallini
cavallini at faunalia.it
Wed Aug 22 00:23:40 PDT 2018
Sweet to hear!
Thanks Paul, looking forward to it.
All the best.
On 08/22/2018 09:08 AM, pblottiere wrote:
>
> Hello Paolo,
>
>
>> Anyone has plans to work to improve them?
>
> Yes, it's my next step over the coming weeks.
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On 08/22/2018 08:08 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>
>> Merci Paul, very good stuff!
>>
>> Results of performances are not really encouraging, is there an
>> explanation for this? Anyone has plans to work to improve them?
>>
>> All the best.
>>
>>
>> On 08/20/2018 11:52 AM, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear PSC,
>>>
>>>
>>> Performance and OGC reports (for WMS 1.3.0 and WFS 1.1.0) are now
>>> generated daily on the new server qgis4.qgis.org. Everything is
>>> available on http://test.qgis.org/.
>>>
>>>
>>> A PR is ongoing to update the Website in order to point to these
>>> reports (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/546).
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you, all those who have helped in this!
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/07/18 21:14, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>> Sounds good.
>>>>
>>>> Richard - could you please order the
>>>>
>>>> EX41S-SSD
>>>> Line-Matrix
>>>> Intel® Core™ i7-6700 Quad-Core
>>>> CPU-B 10032
>>>> RAM: 64 GB DDR4
>>>> SSD: 2x 240 GB SATA 6 Gb/s SSD
>>>>
>>>> on behalf of the project?
>>>>
>>>> After ordering and setting it up, can you please inform how he can
>>>> access the server?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot to the two of you!
>>>>
>>>> Andreas
>>>>
>>>> On 9 July 2018 at 18:17, Paul Blottiere
>>>> <paul.blottiere at oslandia.com <mailto:paul.blottiere at oslandia.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a
>>>>> virtual one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>>>>
>>>>> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>>> <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>>>>> server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>>>>> <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let us know which one you would choose
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Considering that performance tests have to be executed without
>>>> any interferences, I think that a dedicated server would be
>>>> more suitable.
>>>>
>>>> From what I saw on https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>> <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/>, I think that
>>>> EX41S-SSD is good enough (64 GB RAM, Core i7, 2x240GB SSD).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 09/07/18 08:48, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes - we can rent it any time on Hetzner, if you are ready.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Paul: do you think we need a physical server or would a
>>>>> virtual one also work? What are the requirements you have?
>>>>>
>>>>> See https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/
>>>>> <https://www.hetzner.de/dedicated-rootserver/> for dedicated
>>>>> server and https://www.hetzner.de/cloud
>>>>> <https://www.hetzner.de/cloud> for virtual servers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let us know which one you would chooses.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Richard: once Paul lets us know what he wants, could you two
>>>>> get in touch about setting it up and integrating it with the
>>>>> rest of our infrastructure at Hetzner?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-07-09 09:35, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear PSC,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>>>>> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>>>>> further on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doyou haveany news about the server?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Have a good day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello PSC,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would rent a dedicated server in our
>>>>>>> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> would pay for the server.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
>>>>>>> further on this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>, but
>>>>>>> finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
>>>>>>> harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG>
>>>>>>> infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
>>>>>>> shoulders
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
>>>>>>> motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
>>>>>>> what sponsoring level this would equate to.
>>>>>>> we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
>>>>>>> of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>>>> <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
>>>>>>> from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we
>>>>>>> should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
>>>>>>> some confusion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
>>>>>>> mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, thanks!
>>>>>>>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>>>>>>> <http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
>>>>>>>> latest test.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See: http://tests.qgis.org/
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/
>>>>>>>> <http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/>
>>>>>>>> I will add test.qgis.org <http://test.qgis.org> to the https://certificate next round.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Although... tests.qgis.org <http://tests.qgis.org> was a temporary solution, do others think it
>>>>>>>> earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests <http://qgis.org/tests> to it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
>>>>>>>> - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
>>>>>>>> tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
>>>>>>>> both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Volunteers?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Richard,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>>>>>>>>> saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>>>>>>>>> sunday via a cron job.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Y.
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Andreas Neumann
>>>> QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> board member (treasurer)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>> --
>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
>> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
>> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
--
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180822/872c1cc4/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list