[Qgis-psc] Paid doc reviewers campaign for QGIS 3.0 ?
Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.manghi at gmail.com
Fri Feb 2 05:00:00 PST 2018
Hi Harrissou,
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:49 PM, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi PSC,
>
> This is a follow-up to the silence that answers my (in doc repo) and
> Matteo's recent call for reviewers [0] for the Processing docs he's been
> writing for some months now, and more generally for the docs.
> While we are all eager and happy to show what we've done with QGIS 3.0, i'm
> less proud of the documentation state. There's a lot to do but I wouldn't
> want to expand here on the subject; i have already made it repeatedly, here
> and there and when required, PSC has tried things. But give a look to the
> recent activity in the docs repo and you'll maybe get what I mean.
>
> Anyway, this mail is just to ask the PSC to please put on the monday meeting
> agenda discussion of an allocation (if i'm not wrong, QGIS Docs has some
> budget) for paid writers and reviewers for QGIS 3.0 (good after the bug
> fix!). Maybe that will attract other people who in turn will take on this
> task for a while.
>
I guess this also regards me as I have accepted the task to start
writing docs not long ago. As already commented with a few of you, it
has been a rough patch lately for me. I was counting to start the task
sooner but I have been delayed mainly for such personal reasons. If
the deal is still on I was counting start (for real this time) by
Monday (and continue trough the dev meeting and beyond).
with regards
-- GM --
More information about the Qgis-psc
mailing list