[Qgis-psc] Paid doc reviewers campaign for QGIS 3.0 ?

[DelazJ]

Hi Giovanni,

Sorry if it looks like it was against you. That was not my intention, in
any case. We have already chatted about that and I was counting you as a
writer.
My main concern is that we have less active contributors (Doc team has
never been big afaik, that said). Current needs are on reviewing big
changes and having partly done that alone for some weeks, it's not a
pleasant activity, sometimes demotivating (but maybe this is my way of
"working" that doesn't correspond to the current situation). Hence, my idea
was to have some more people (still good to have new blood) with you to
start the process and have more hands to fix the numerous issues that are
already listed.

Regards,
Harrissou

2018-02-02 14:22 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>:

> Hi all,
>
> Yes Giovanni - we still count on you! It would be good if you could
> dedicate time to the documentation.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> On 02.02.2018 14:00, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
>
>> Hi Harrissou,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:49 PM, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi PSC,
>>>
>>> This is a follow-up to the silence that answers my (in doc repo) and
>>> Matteo's recent call for reviewers [0] for the Processing docs he's been
>>> writing for some months now, and more generally for the docs.
>>> While we are all eager and happy to show what we've done with QGIS 3.0,
>>> i'm
>>> less proud of the documentation state. There's a lot to do but I wouldn't
>>> want to expand here on the subject; i have already made it repeatedly,
>>> here
>>> and there and when required, PSC has tried things. But give a look to the
>>> recent activity in the docs repo and you'll maybe get what I mean.
>>>
>>> Anyway, this mail is just to ask the PSC to please put on the monday
>>> meeting
>>> agenda discussion of an allocation (if i'm not wrong, QGIS Docs has some
>>> budget) for paid writers and reviewers for QGIS 3.0 (good after the bug
>>> fix!). Maybe that will attract other people who in turn will take on this
>>> task for a while.
>>>
>>>
>> I guess this also regards me as I have accepted the task to start
>> writing docs not long ago. As already commented with a few of you, it
>> has been a rough patch lately for me. I was counting to start the task
>> sooner but I have been delayed mainly for such personal reasons. If
>> the deal is still on I was counting start (for real this time) by
>> Monday (and continue trough the dev meeting and beyond).
>>
>> with regards
>>
>> -- GM --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180202/e3fd6fac/attachment.html>