[Qgis-psc] Migration to Github

[Vincent Picavet (ml)]

Hi,

On 14/02/2018 22:21, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> I think it couldn't have said better.

+1 here !

> Thanks Andreas.

>From me too :-)

Vincent

> 
> Il 14 febbraio 2018 21:29:41 CET, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>
> ha scritto:
> 
>     Hi Denis,
> 
>     The voting was controversial. I know that more people voted for the
>     Github solution - strictly spoken this would mean that you could go
>     ahead with migration to github. But the fact that so many people
>     felt uncomfortable with moving to github - esp. in the light that it
>     hasn't been shown by a test migration that issue tracking in github
>     is really feasibly for that many tickets - I think that we shouldn't
>     move to github yet.
> 
>     Personally, I don't understand the rush anyway. Shouldn't we
>     concentrate on the work around releasing QGIS 3 first and then when
>     there are more resources available - first do a test migration and
>     see if it is feasible to:
> 
>     a) keep the history
> 
>     b) show that tagging as the only way for structuring tickets is
>     really feasible
> 
>     Then we can still decide if we want to move to github or not. And
>     finally, there are concerns that github is not a "free" platform.
>     Neither Open Source not it was proven that tickets could be exported
>     from Github properly, if we'd have to.
> 
>     Please also note that both Richard and Jürgen invested quite a bit
>     of time to upgrade Redmine and move to its own separate virtual
>     machine. The current Redmine works both fast and stable and most
>     people did not complain that it is hard to use. So not really a
>     reason to rush away from Redmine.
> 
>     Greetings,
> 
>     Andreas
> 
> 
>     On 14.02.2018 18:48, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
>>     Dear PSC,
>>
>>     On the minutes of last PSC meeting, a "proposition to respond" was
>>     accepted, but if I'm correct there were no resonse yet.
>>
>>     Shall we take what is written in the minutes as the decision? Or
>>     shall we wait for a communication from your side ?
>>
>>     Thanks for letting us know as the accepted decision from the vote
>>     was to move to github before the release of 3.0...
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     Denis
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Qgis-psc mailing list
>>     Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sorry for being short
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>