[Qgis-psc] Migration to Github

[Paolo Cavallini]

I think it couldn't have said better.
Thanks Andreas.

Il 14 febbraio 2018 21:29:41 CET, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net> ha scritto:
>Hi Denis,
>
>The voting was controversial. I know that more people voted for the 
>Github solution - strictly spoken this would mean that you could go 
>ahead with migration to github. But the fact that so many people felt 
>uncomfortable with moving to github - esp. in the light that it hasn't 
>been shown by a test migration that issue tracking in github is really 
>feasibly for that many tickets - I think that we shouldn't move to 
>github yet.
>
>Personally, I don't understand the rush anyway. Shouldn't we
>concentrate 
>on the work around releasing QGIS 3 first and then when there are more 
>resources available - first do a test migration and see if it is 
>feasible to:
>
>a) keep the history
>
>b) show that tagging as the only way for structuring tickets is really 
>feasible
>
>Then we can still decide if we want to move to github or not. And 
>finally, there are concerns that github is not a "free" platform. 
>Neither Open Source not it was proven that tickets could be exported 
>from Github properly, if we'd have to.
>
>Please also note that both Richard and Jürgen invested quite a bit of 
>time to upgrade Redmine and move to its own separate virtual machine. 
>The current Redmine works both fast and stable and most people did not 
>complain that it is hard to use. So not really a reason to rush away 
>from Redmine.
>
>Greetings,
>
>Andreas
>
>
>On 14.02.2018 18:48, Denis Rouzaud wrote:
>> Dear PSC,
>>
>> On the minutes of last PSC meeting, a "proposition to respond" was 
>> accepted, but if I'm correct there were no resonse yet.
>>
>> Shall we take what is written in the minutes as the decision? Or
>shall 
>> we wait for a communication from your side ?
>>
>> Thanks for letting us know as the accepted decision from the vote was
>
>> to move to github before the release of 3.0...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-- 
Sorry for being short
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180214/f0bc010f/attachment.html>