[Qgis-psc] Abstimmung: Umzug der QGIS Fehlerverfolgung von Redmine zu GitHub?

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi, 
like Jurgen, the Loomio vote came suddenly, did we miss a decision somewhere?

Concerning gitlab tags, it is pretty much the same label / tag system as in github. So yes we need a good
labeling system. But I think in redmine, we probably have too much categories. If search engine is more
accurate than Redmine's , I won't miss them. 

Cheers
Régis Le mardi 30 janvier 2018 à 15:32 +0100, Jürgen E. Fischer a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 30. Jan 2018 at 14:16:27 +0100, Thomas Schüttenberg QGIS-DE e.V. wrote:
> > 
> > Liebe QGIS-DE Mitglieder,
> > 
> > ABSTIMMUNG:
> > I agree to migrate to GitHub issues and deprecate the current Redmine tracker
> I don't - but I don't have a vote.  And I even missed that there was going to
> be a vote and there is another discussion going on in a closed forum.
> 
> I'd like to see migrated issues first to get a feel how much better it is -
> because now I can only imagine that we only get the same ability to classify
> bugs using a huge tag cloud - which I'd imagine would render the thing
> unusable.
> 
> How is bug reporting in gitlab?
> 
> 
> Jürgen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 299 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180130/5ac023e3/attachment.sig>