[Qgis-psc] Questions on website

[DelazJ]

Hi,

I recently had the same concern as Andreas with QGIS Documentation and
asked our sys admins but did not get a clear answer on who should be the
contact. Would be nice to know.
And the issues about improving the website also concern the docs website.
So if there's a budget for backend fixes +1 for me (for what it's worth)

Regards,
Harrissou

Le ven. 18 oct. 2019 à 09:32, Alessandro Pasotti <apasotti at gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
> A possible solution - if is there any budget left - would be to dedicate a
> few hours from the paid bugfixing time to the website issues, I have a
> strong web dev background and I can spend a few hours on it.
> I only recommend to postpone that after the release, I think it's better
> to focus on the application bugs right now.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 8:41 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I agree with Andreas: amonge these there are velid suggestions, and real
>> problems. The fact that we were unable to solve or implement them does
>> not mean they are not valid. I suggest reverting it.
>> Cheers.
>>
>> On 18/10/19 08:24, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> > Hi Marco,
>> >
>> > That's pretty aggressive - from the ones you closed I believe many are
>> > still relevant. If I opened such a request and someone else closed that
>> > without the issue being solved and the issue is still relevant, I'd be
>> > not so amused.
>> >
>> > But we'll see how they react. Some issues are also definitely not
>> > relevant anymore.
>> >
>> > Thanks anyway,
>> >
>> > Andreas
>> >
>> > On 2019-10-17 19:17, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Andreas,
>> >>
>> >> I took a look at half the issues and took a rather radical approach of
>> >> closing all very old issues/enhancements request (<2016) and prompting
>> >> for reopen if wished.  If nobody cared for them in 5-6 years they are
>> >> probably not needed.
>> >>
>> >> when I'll have more time I'll check the rest.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >> Marco
>> >>
>> >> On 17.10.19 17:44, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>> >>> Hi Andreas,
>> >>> thanks for pointing this out
>> >>>
>> >>> On 17/10/19 16:23, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Sometimes I have questions on the website that Richard probably could
>> >>>> answer me - but since he is not on PSC anymore I don't want to bother
>> >>>> him always with some questions.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Who else can I ask on the PSC regarding technical questions on the
>> >>>> website?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> In this specific case I wonder what to do with this PR:
>> >>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/pull/685
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Also - there are lots of issues on the Website
>> >>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/issues where to me it seems
>> no-one
>> >>>> really feels responsible for.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I do believe that we should have one or better two people who feel
>> >>>> responsible for the website, including maintenance of the Github
>> repo,
>> >>>> issues and PR of the website.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The current situation is far from ideal.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any ideas?
>> >>> the only options I see are putting out a call for volunteers, or
>> hiring
>> >>> someone.
>> >>> Cheers.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
>> QGIS.ORG Chair:
>> http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> --
> Alessandro Pasotti
> w3:   www.itopen.it
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20191018/5467e922/attachment.html>