[Qgis-psc] Resource Sharing plugin in core?

[Alessandro Pasotti]

Perfect!

Thank you.

@Paolo

To solve the problem of a "standard" set of plugins that QGIS.org
recommends, we could use a meta plugin that is shipped by default and has
the recommended plugins as dependencies, see: plugin_dependencies
https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/plugins/plugins.html#plugin-metadata




On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:02 PM Håvard Tveite <havard.tveite at nmbu.no>
wrote:

>
> On 18.02.2020 20:13, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> > Hi Håvard
> >
> >   From my side, no big objections but also no big plus that I can see.
> >
> > The "appearing official" would mostly be something for developers, and I
> > don't think that's the main target audience.
> >
> > Suggestion:
> >
> > - create a new organisation QGIS-Contribution, fork the repository
> > there, ask Akbar for permissions.
>
> Done.
>
> 1) Organisation: https://github.com/QGIS-Contribution
>
> 2) The repository has been imported / copied:
> https://github.com/QGIS-Contribution/Resource_Sharing.
>
> 3) Akbar and Alessandro have been invited as owners.
>
> I have used the QGIS logo and qgis.org association - I
> assume that is OK.
>
> Please let me know who else to include in this
> "organisation". It would be nice to have some of the PSC
> members on board.
>
> > - roll the drums where it's visible for end users - blog post, twitter,
> > mailing lists, news panel ...
>
> Not today...
>
> ToDo: Update the metadata on
> https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qgis_resource_sharing/
>
> Håvard
>
> > Matthisa
> >
> >
> > On 2/18/20 5:10 PM, Håvard Tveite wrote:
> >> On 18.02.2020 16:40, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> I think our best bet is leaving the plugin where it is and advertise it
> >>> broadly to make it known.
> >> I still don't understand why it would be a problem to just move
> >> the plugin repository under to github.org/qgis.
> >>
> >> Up sides:
> >> * Akbar would like to "get rid of it", and this would help him
> >>      achieve that
> >> * The QGIS organisation would get some more control over the
> >>      administration of this plugin. Everyone seems to agree that
> >>      resource sharing is important, so some more control would
> >>      be OK.
> >> * The plugin would appear more "official".
> >> * Simple to do - just copy the Akbars repository and give it a
> >>      sensible name
> >>
> >> Down sides:
> >> * None provided
> >>
> >> Håvard
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
w3:   www.itopen.it
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200219/f2ac486f/attachment.html>