[Qgis-user] questions about the FOSSGIS 2013 benchmark comparisons between QGIS Server and UMN Mapserver

[Andreas Neumann]

 Hi Giovanni,

 It is important that you test QGIS master not QGIS 1.8. QGIS 1.8 was 
 definitely slower than UMN, but in master there are performance 
 improvements in the server part. Marco knows the details.

 Andreas

 On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:09:18 +0200, G. Allegri wrote:
> Hi,
> I was reading the graphs (I do not understand german, sorry) of the
> slides from Sourcepole about their banchmarks [1].
> I was surprised to see how QGIS Server outperforms UMN Mapserver,
> because my experience was different. I haven't done comparisons in 
> the
> last months. In the past performances didn't appear better then
> Mapserver.
>
> Marco (and the ohters from Sourcepole), could you share the
> configurations adopted for the benchmark? Hardware, http server
> configuration, caching, tiling, etc.? Something is written inside the
> PDF, but Google Translator isn't doing a great work :(
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Giovanni
>
> 
> [1] http://sourcepole.ch/assets/2013/6/17/fossgis_2013_performanceoptimierte_wms_dienste.pdf
> [1]

-- 
 --
 Andreas Neumann
 Böschacherstrasse 10A
 8624 Grüt (Gossau ZH)
 Switzerland