[Qgis-user] questions about the FOSSGIS 2013 benchmark comparisons between QGIS Server and UMN Mapserver

[G. Allegri]

Thanks Andreas,
I haven't tried QGIS server from master yet. Nice to know it.

giovanni


2013/6/21 Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>

> Hi Giovanni,
>
> It is important that you test QGIS master not QGIS 1.8. QGIS 1.8 was
> definitely slower than UMN, but in master there are performance
> improvements in the server part. Marco knows the details.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:09:18 +0200, G. Allegri wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I was reading the graphs (I do not understand german, sorry) of the
>> slides from Sourcepole about their banchmarks [1].
>> I was surprised to see how QGIS Server outperforms UMN Mapserver,
>> because my experience was different. I haven't done comparisons in the
>> last months. In the past performances didn't appear better then
>> Mapserver.
>>
>> Marco (and the ohters from Sourcepole), could you share the
>> configurations adopted for the benchmark? Hardware, http server
>> configuration, caching, tiling, etc.? Something is written inside the
>> PDF, but Google Translator isn't doing a great work :(
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Giovanni
>>
>>
>> [1] http://sourcepole.ch/**assets/2013/6/17/fossgis_2013_**
>> performanceoptimierte_wms_**dienste.pdf<http://sourcepole.ch/assets/2013/6/17/fossgis_2013_performanceoptimierte_wms_dienste.pdf>
>> [1]
>>
>
> --
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> Böschacherstrasse 10A
> 8624 Grüt (Gossau ZH)
> Switzerland
> ______________________________**_________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/qgis-user<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user>
>



-- 
Giovanni Allegri
http://about.me/giovanniallegri
blog: http://blog.spaziogis.it
GEO+ geomatica in Italia http://bit.ly/GEOplus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20130621/a5377059/attachment.html>