[Qgis-user] "on the fly" reprojection options in 2.0

[Jonathan Moules]

On 16 October 2013 21:37, Radim Blazek <radim.blazek at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Jonathan Moules
> <jonathanmoules at warwickshire.gov.uk> wrote:
> > Hi Ramon,
> > Thanks for the clarification.
> > But given that, shouldn't they be radio buttons, not checkboxes? They
> > certainly sound mutually exclusive.
>
> Yes, I fixed that in master.
>
> Radim
>

Thanks, I guess I don't need to open a ticket then!
Cheers,
Jonathan



>
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> > On 15 October 2013 15:00, Ramon Andiñach <custard at westnet.com.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> That got me too.
> >>
> >> > On 15 Oct 2013, at 21:26, Jonathan Moules
> >> > <jonathanmoules at warwickshire.gov.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi List,
> >> >   Maybe it's just me, but in 2.0 under Settings -> Options -> CRS I
> have
> >> > two options:
> >> >
> >> > "Automatically enable 'on the fly' reprojection if layers have
> different
> >> > CRS"
> >>
> >> This is "don't turn on OTF until you need it."
> >> So OTF starts off, but will turn on when you load something in a
> different
> >> CRS.
> >>
> >> > and
> >> > "Enable 'on the fly' reprojection by default"
> >>
> >> This is "just turn OTF on and be done with it already".
> >>
> >> So OTF starts on and stays on.
> >>
> >>
> >> > My question - what is the difference between these two? They sound
> like
> >> > different phrasings of the same thing.
> >>
> >> So slightly different rules on how you want OTF to behave.
> >>
> >> It might be that you almost exclusively work in one CRS, but
> occasionally
> >> use something in another CRS, in which case the first option is good for
> >> you.
> >>
> >> Or you might be somewhere that you will use 2 or three different CRS
> each
> >> day so the second is just simpler.
> >>
> >> Also, as good as QGIS's OTF is (and I think it's fantastic) there will
> >> always be a cost to using it, so if you're a speed freak or have big
> data
> >> you probably don't want OTF on unless you need it.
> >>
> >> I'm sure one of the others will step in if I've got this all wrong.
> >>
> >> -ramon.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Qgis-user mailing list
> >> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> >
> >
> >
> > This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may
> > contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and
> > should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or
> > authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it,
> or
> > disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in
> error
> > please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from
> us,
> > including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to
> recording
> > and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-user mailing list
> > Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>

-- 
This transmission is intended for the named addressee(s) only and may 
contain sensitive or protectively marked material up to RESTRICTED and 
should be handled accordingly. Unless you are the named addressee (or 
authorised to receive it for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or 
disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error 
please notify the sender immediately. All email traffic sent to or from us, 
including without limitation all GCSX traffic, may be subject to recording 
and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20131017/3324d893/attachment.html>