[Qgis-user] is there a way to install a running well version of QGis in Xenial 16.04??
Randal Hale
rjhale at northrivergeographic.com
Tue Sep 20 17:07:51 PDT 2016
Henri - sorry for the late reply back.
If you look under /etc/apt/sources.list.d - do you have a QGIS.list
file? Or something under /etc/apt/sources.list with a repository listing
for QGIS?
Yes - it is possible because I am sitting here running QGIS on Ubuntu 16.04.
Randy
On 09/19/2016 02:36 PM, Henri LABORDE wrote:
>
> Yes, seriously, is there a way???
>
> which QGis version ?
>
> and how to proceed?
>
> That sems impossible, because a lot of mysterious messages like these
> ones:
>
> cheers
>
> Henri (desperate Linux user)
>
> ==================================================================
>
> Paramétrage de qgis-providers (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...
> /usr/lib/qgis/crssync: error while loading shared libraries:
> *libgif.so.4*: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
> dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-providers (--configure) :
> le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une
> erreur de sortie d'état 127
> Paramétrage de libjs-leaflet (0.7.3~dfsg-1) ...
> Paramétrage de qgis-common (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...
> dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de qgis :
> qgis dépend de qgis-providers (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :
> Le paquet qgis-providers n'est pas encore configuré.
>
> dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis (--configure) :
> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré
> Paramétrage de qgis-plugin-globe-common (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...
> Aucun rapport « apport » n'a été créé car le message d'erreur indique
> une erreur consécutive à un échec précédent.
> dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la
> configuration de qgis-plugin-globe :
> qgis-plugin-globe dépend de qgis (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :
> Le paquet qgis n'est pas encore configuré.
>
> dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-plugin-globe (--configure) :
> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré
> Aucun rapport « apport » n'a été créé car le message d'erreur indique
> une erreur consécutive à un échec précédent.
> Paramétrage de qgis-plugin-grass-common
> (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...
> dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de
> qgis-provider-grass :
> qgis-provider-grass dépend de qgis (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ;
> cependant :
> Le paquet qgis n'est pas encore configuré.
>
> dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-provider-grass (--configure) :
> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré
> Aucun rapport « apport » écrit car MaxReports a déjà été atteint
> dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de
> qgis-plugin-grass :
> qgis-plugin-grass dépend de qgis (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :
> Le paquet qgis n'est pas encore configuré.
> qgis-plugin-grass dépend de qgis-provider-grass (=
> 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :
> Le paquet qgis-provider-grass n'est pas encore configuré.
>
> dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-plugin-grass (--configure) :
> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré
> Aucun rapport « apport » écrit car MaxReports a déjà été atteint
> Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour libc-bin
> (2.23-0ubuntu3) ...
> Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution :
> qgis-providers
> qgis
> qgis-plugin-globe
> qgis-provider-grass
> qgis-plugin-grass
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
> ======================================================================
>
> very very bad trip since I've made the upgrade from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS
>
> La curiosité est un vilain défaut...curiosity is a bad thing...
>
> > Message du 14/09/16 06:24
> > De : "Blumentrath, Stefan" <Stefan.Blumentrath at nina.no>
> > A : "Randal Hale" <rjhale at northrivergeographic.com>,
> "qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org" <qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [Qgis-user] Ubuntu updating instructions
> >
> >
>
> And if I may add:
>
> Even if the users are aware of the fact that ubuntugis-unstable
> contains the current releases, it can be hard to impossible to
> convince a GIS-ignorant system administrator that it is OK to
> install “unstable” packages.
>
> But this issue is not a QGIS issue I guess...
>
> *From:*Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Randal Hale
> > *Sent:* 13. september 2016 16:45
> > *To:* qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> > *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] Ubuntu updating instructions
>
> >
>
> On 09/13/2016 10:23 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
>
> Hi Randal,
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13. Sep 2016 at 00:21:21 -0400, Randal Hale wrote:
>
> It's a little bit confusing. There are like three repositories:
>
> stable, unstable, and testing. Testing you don't want (unless you
>
> want to test packages). Typically stable is a bit older. Unstable is
>
> current. Which doesn't really make sense - but that's the way it is.
>
>
>
> Not like it matters much in this case.
>
>
>
> We have packages in qgis.org/debian/ against the plain versions of the
>
> distributions (debian and **ubuntu**) and in qgis/ubuntugis/ packages against
>
> newer dependencies from - and only from - ubuntugis-unstable.
>
>
>
> Looks like it's hard for people to accept that there are also ubuntu packages
>
> in a directory called debian and that probably makes them jump on the other
>
> because it has ubuntu in it's name.
>
> I was thinking about it last night (and I was up way to late) and
> it is a bit confusing for the casual user. They've installed
> Ubuntu (or mint/debian/xubuntu/etc) and they may not understand
> ubuntu is based off debian. So like you said - they see debian but
> want to use Ubuntu. They go to UbuntuGIS and they see the
> repositories for UbuntuGIS and the choice is unstable (and no one
> likes unstable software) and stable (which doesn't contain the
> newest software). So you end up going "Use Unstable because it's
> stable and current".
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Under my /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory I made a qgis.list file
>
> and put the following in there:
>
>
>
> debhttp://qgis.org/debian xenial main
>
> debhttp://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu xenial main
>
>
>
> Why? That are the packages not based on ubuntugis with the dependencies from
>
> ubuntugis.
>
> Do I have this wrong? I thought I had the repositories for the
> install correct based off the directions on qgis.org. Which I
> could completely have it wrong. With the above repos I'm getting
> QGIS 2.16.x and GDAL 2.1.x.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Jürgen
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Qgis-user mailing list
>
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org>
>
> List info:http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
> Unsubscribe:http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> -----------------
>
> Randal Hale
>
> North River Geographic Systems, Inc
>
> http://www.northrivergeographic.com
>
> 423.653.3611rjhale at northrivergeographic.com
> <mailto:rjhale at northrivergeographic.com>
>
> twitter:rjhale
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Randal Hale
North River Geographic Systems, Inc
http://www.northrivergeographic.com
423.653.3611 rjhale at northrivergeographic.com
twitter:rjhale http://about.me/rjhale
http://www.northrivergeographic.com/introduction-to-quantum-gis
https://www.facebook.com/NRGSInc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20160920/9b1396f9/attachment.html>
More information about the Qgis-user
mailing list