[TCMUG] Open Data and esri?
Fawcett, David (MNIT)
David.Fawcett at state.mn.us
Tue Feb 18 08:30:39 PST 2014
The OGC just adopted the GeoPackage format. http://www.geopackage.org/
I know that both the proprietary and open source folks were pretty heavily involved in (the second round) of the formation of the spec. I haven't heard much from either camp since the announcement, but I am curious to hear the perspectives of both people like Chris Holmes and ESRI. Has anyone seen any blog posts or tweets about it?
David.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Little [mailto:theduckylittle at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:09 AM
To: Fawcett, David (MNIT)
Cc: Brian Fischer; <nancread at mmcd.org>; tcmug at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [TCMUG] Open Data and esri?
ESRI does try to package some of the rendering/style information in their Geodatabases. Right now the standard-open-geo interchange format is shapefiles. And that could really use some updating (I don't think GeoJSON is a compelling alternative but that is probably another argument for another thread).
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Fawcett, David (MNIT) <David.Fawcett at state.mn.us> wrote:
> I think that they got behind on the 'trend of open data' and other products have been gaining a lot of momentum in that space. This new initiative appears to be an extension of ArcGIS Online.
>
> I agree with Brian though, open data and open data formats are two different things. ESRI has continued to make conscious decisions to create and promote their own proprietary data formats.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcmug-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:tcmug-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brian Fischer
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 8:01 PM
> To: <nancread at mmcd.org>
> Cc: tcmug at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [TCMUG] Open Data and esri?
>
> Open Data was also a keynote at this weeks WI GIS conference from a City of Madison Council member and has been a policy other Cities are putting into place.
>
> I think you have to make sure you are differeniating between what is meant by Open Data Initiatives and Open formats/standards. They have different meanings in this context.
>
> Brian Fischer
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 14, 2014, at 2:18 PM, "Nancy Read" <nancread at mmcd.org<mailto:nancread at mmcd.org>> wrote:
>
> What have you-all heard about this? (from Andrew Turner)
>
> http://blogs.esri.com/esri/arcgis/2014/02/10/preview-of-open-data/
>
> Good buzzwords, but so far my experience getting web services from Arc shops has been a bit iffy?
> - Nancy Read
> _______________________________________________
> Tcmug mailing list
> Tcmug at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Tcmug at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmug
> _______________________________________________
> Tcmug mailing list
> Tcmug at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmug
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tcmug mailing list
> Tcmug at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmug
More information about the Tcmug
mailing list