[Tilecache] Huge dateline gap

[Roger André]

Sounds good.  I'm going to take a stab at it, and will send you my edits.
Not sure how soon I'll get them done, but I'll start red-lining a print copy
of the doc while I ride the bus.  Should have something in the next couple
of weeks.
--

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Christopher Schmidt <
crschmidt at metacarta.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:58:30PM -0800, Dane Springmeyer wrote:
> > Roger,
> >
> > I'm sure others will correct me where I'm mistaken, but I would do a
> > read-only subversion checkout of the docs:
> >
> > $ svn co http://svn.tilecache.org/trunk/tilecache/docs/ tilecache_docs
> > $ cd tilecache_docs
> >
> > * Then make my edits...
> > * Then check my changes...
>
> Yes.
>
> Currently, giving access to the 'docs' would also mean giving access to
> all of TileCache. I have no problem doing that for sufficiently
> trustworthy users, but that trust first has to be earned by a series of
> sane-looking changes to some part of the code -- whether that's by doc
> changes, code changes, or otherwise.
>
> At the moment,, I'm the primary maintainer of the TileCache code, and I
> prefer to review the things that happen to the code. There are a number
> of things which could be written into documentation that are not what I
> would refer to as 'best practices' in any sense of the word, so I like
> to still have editorial review on doc changes at this time.
>
> If you really have so much documentation to write that it becomes
> annoying to me to commit the changes, I'm sure you'll get commit access
> pretty quickly :)
>
> Regards,
> --
> Christopher Schmidt
> MetaCarta
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tilecache/attachments/20081119/231bb491/attachment.html