[Tilecache] DiskCache through multiple disks

[Pedro Mendes]

Hi Chris and Jorge,

@Jorge
I'm looking for options using only our client infrastructure.

@ Chris
That's an option, for sure. What I was looking to know is about
the possibility of splitting the tiles through different disks (on
different machines or not) and only having one tilecache instance. It will
be achievable having several disks in the same machine each one keeping the
tiles of a different zoom level?

We're evaluating options, right now.

Thanks.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:33 PM, <christopher.schmidt at nokia.com> wrote:

>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 9:18 AM, ext Jorge Arévalo wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Pedro Miguel  Mendes
> > <p.m.g.mendes at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Can anyone give me a scenario where one could set up multiple disks to
> store
> >> the tiles in a distributed way? All the disks are in machines in the
> same
> >> infrastructure.
> >>
> >
> > What about a distributed TMS/WMTS service? Using a Cloud infrastructure.
>
> ... What? How is that related to the question he's asking? :p
>
> Pedro: I don't have any suggestions on storing tiles across multiple
> machines.
> One of the things I Know people have done before is given multiple machines
> different DNS names, and then used deterministic round-robin (like the tile
> generation in OpenLayers) -- then, each server only gets some of the
> requests
> (where 'some' is the number of servers you have in the round robin).
>
> -- Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tilecache/attachments/20120116/061b44b1/attachment.html