[ZOO-PSC] Proposal to move the workshop materials to GitHub

Daniel Kastl daniel at georepublic.de
Wed Aug 23 11:45:19 PDT 2017


+1 to seperate repositories.

However, Git doesn't really like big files either, so frequent changes of
images will grow the repository size as well.

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Jeff McKenna <
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:

> On 2017-08-18 6:06 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>
>> Dear friends,
>>
>> I would be more bold and propose to move everything to git :)
>> We could use http://git.osgeo.org and keep a mirror of all the code in
>> GitHub too (for visibility).
>>
>> Please have a look at a similar conversation happening these day in the
>> PostGIS devel mailing list:
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2017-August/026268.html
>>
>> Best,
>> Angelos
>>
>
> +1 to leveraging OSGeo's GOGS as the ZOO-Project repository (you can read
> more about GOGS at https://gogs.io/ - Sandro has done great work plugging
> this in for OSGeo); as Angelos mentioned, OSGeo's implementation is at
> http://git.osgeo.org .  This will also look great for the ZOO-Project's
> incubation push.  -jeff
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zoo-psc mailing list
> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc
>



-- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/zoo-psc/attachments/20170824/46aa11a3/attachment.html>


More information about the Zoo-psc mailing list