[ZOO-PSC] Proposal to move the workshop materials to GitHub

[Massimiliano Cannata]

+1
Maxi

Il 23 ago 2017 8:45 PM, "Daniel Kastl" <daniel at georepublic.de> ha scritto:

> +1 to seperate repositories.
>
> However, Git doesn't really like big files either, so frequent changes of
> images will grow the repository size as well.
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Jeff McKenna <
> jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-08-18 6:06 AM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote:
>>
>>> Dear friends,
>>>
>>> I would be more bold and propose to move everything to git :)
>>> We could use http://git.osgeo.org and keep a mirror of all the code in
>>> GitHub too (for visibility).
>>>
>>> Please have a look at a similar conversation happening these day in the
>>> PostGIS devel mailing list:
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/2017-August/026268.html
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Angelos
>>>
>>
>> +1 to leveraging OSGeo's GOGS as the ZOO-Project repository (you can read
>> more about GOGS at https://gogs.io/ - Sandro has done great work
>> plugging this in for OSGeo); as Angelos mentioned, OSGeo's implementation
>> is at http://git.osgeo.org .  This will also look great for the
>> ZOO-Project's incubation push.  -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Zoo-psc mailing list
>> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zoo-psc mailing list
> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/zoo-psc/attachments/20170823/98fec233/attachment.html>