[Board] Compile data for budget

Vicky Vergara vicky at georepublic.de
Mon Dec 10 23:14:51 PST 2018


You treated us the same,
but some of the incubation committee members was a different story.
I felt on the blessed side

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:12 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:

> My intention was to treat both projects equally - make sure that acting’s
> as incubation chair I got a request in to the treasurer.
>
> Should I just do so on behalf of the project? Not really as I act on
> behalf of the incubation committee....
>
> Should we make a motion on the incubation committee mailing list? I am not
> sure ... that seems to take a while (two weeks via email).
>
> Indeed I am so not sure I am asking the board to cosiest taking this
> responsibility in 2019. The board has a procedure (monthly meeting and also
> electronic voting) where they can act faster than the incubation committee.
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:05 PM Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Jody: Finally, found a couple of mails you sent:
>>
>> [1] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2017-November/003412.html
>> [2] https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2017-November/003428.html
>>
>> So, my conclusion is, ZOO-Project and pgRouting project looks that made
>> the same process
>> But the way we were treated was completely different.
>>
>> Regards
>> Vicky
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 6:48 PM Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I sent it to treasurer that maybe happened to be you
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
>>> Jul 26, 2018, 8:44 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> to treasurer, Daniel, bcc: Rohith
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 6:39 PM Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure, I passed your request on to the incubation committee here:
>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2018-July/003658.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You passed the request I made to the budget committee, I didn't mail
>>>>> it to incbator
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You made the request to me as incubation chair.
>>>>
>>>> And a similar one in response to the zoo-project:
>>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2018-July/003631.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You passed the request Gerald made probably to the budget committee,
>>>>> He didn't mail it  to incubator
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The treasurer made the request to be me as incubation chair.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "without the need of asking incubation committee"
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well, I thought budget was handled by budget committee and it seems
>>>>> you want to change that some part of the budget is to be handled by
>>>>> incubator committee (for the community projects).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The budget committee stopped functioning, the board has taken over that
>>>> responsibility (and indeed it is our focus for December).
>>>>
>>>> The incubation committee was asked to manage the osgeo community
>>>> activity when it was formed (initially focused on setting good clear
>>>> guidelines for joining).
>>>>
>>>> Ideally ZOO-Project can graduate and operate independently next year
>>>>>> (with their own committee and officer).
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ideally that could happen to pgRouting also
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That would be great! It is really what we are trying for.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "get some budget"
>>>>>> The only way to participate in the OSGeo budget planning is through a
>>>>>> committee (the board is one such committee, as is marketing, incubation,
>>>>>> and each osgeo project). If you look to the top of the thread I was
>>>>>> considering which committee should be responsible for community projects
>>>>>> once they have been accepted.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, maybe I used the wrong word: get funds
>>>>> Can be by donations, or by participating in programs like GSoC, or
>>>>> request some budget to OSGeo
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, and for OSGeo activities usually we try for a mix of donations
>>>> and osgeo budget.
>>>>
>>>> Any way, please consider that community projects have the option to
>>>>> look for funds somewhere else.
>>>>> when you make your proposals
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, and if a community project / local chapter / inititive has
>>>> something cool going on they can always approach the board (or one of the
>>>> other committees) for financial support.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)Salzmannstraße 44,
>>> 81739 München, Germany <https://maps.google.com/?q=Salzmannstra%C3%9Fe+44,+%0D%0A81739+M%C3%BCnchen,+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>
>>> Vicky Vergara
>>> Operations Research
>>>
>>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>>
>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>>
>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany <https://maps.google.com/?q=Salzmannstra%C3%9Fe+44,+%0D%0A81739+M%C3%BCnchen,+Germany&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>
>> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>


-- 

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44,
81739 München, Germany

Vicky Vergara
Operations Research

eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info

Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/attachments/20181211/689d3454/attachment.htm>


More information about the Board mailing list