[Foss4g2009] Re: Geospatial Integration Showcase - meeting notes

[Bruce Bannerman]

Paul,

I wasn't referring to your efforts for 2007.

I'm looking at how we could possibly sell the concept for 2009, with the
'event' managed by OGC as an independent body.

I take your and Simon's point on relative priorities though.

Greg, what is your take on this from OGC? Do you think that a 'shootout'
type event overseen by OGC and run on a virtual server environment as
described in my earlier emails would get buy-in within industry, especially
if it was co-located at a FOSS4G conference?


Bruce Bannerman



On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>wrote:

> You think we didn't sell it that way? :)
> ASAIK this isn't a sales problem it's an effort problem. "Come do a
> bunch of work in addition to all the other preparation you will have
> to do for this conference."
> It's #12 on the priority list, no surprise it doesn't get done.
> P
>
> 2008/11/6 Bruce Bannerman <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com>:
> > sorry, resend as this email address wasn't subscribed to list.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Bruce Bannerman
> > <bruce.bannerman.osgeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> How about if this was sold as Jeff McKenna alluded to during our
> >> conference call?
> >>
> >>
> >> "Step up to the plate and show the world how good and how interoperable
> >> your spatial software is.
> >>
> >> Compete on an even playing field, with a neutral umpire, using the same
> >> data and server.
> >>
> >> The spatial world will be watching the results."
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course, everyone will have the best software. If after the event they
> >> find that they don't, then there will be an incentive to do better the
> >> following year (at FOSS4Gnnnn).
> >>
> >>
> >> fwiw
> >>
> >>
> >> Bruce Bannerman
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Paul Ramsey [mailto:pramsey at cleverelephant.ca]
> >> > Sent: Friday, 7 November 2008 4:32 AM
> >> > To: mapbutcher
> >> > Cc: Cameron Shorter; foss4g2009; Jeff McKenna; Bruce
> >> > Bannerman; Greg Buehler; Justin Deoliveira
> >> > Subject: Re: [Foss4g2009] Re: Geospatial Integration Showcase
> >> > - meeting notes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> >> >
> >> > The 2007 experience very much validates Simon. In the end,
> >> > Justin and DaveP volunteered a good deal of time to put the
> >> > foundation elements into place for a showcase (data gathered,
> >> > documented with metadata on the wiki, loaded into public
> >> > PostGIS instance) and nobody else showed up and helped.
> >> > Vendors were too busy with other things to dedicate even the
> >> > time to stand up a demo on the public data, despite lots of
> >> > harassment on our part. Even folks like DM Solutions didn't step up.
> >> >
> >> > Catch-22, if you expect everyone to come and add their
> >> > ingredients to the stew, they won't. If you just do it all
> >> > yourself, well, it's not much of an "integration" showcase
> >> > anymore, is it?
> >> >
> >> > P.
> >> >
> >> > 2008/11/6 mapbutcher <mapbutcher at mapbutcher.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > I think your proposed vision is valid and I'm not wanting to spread
> >> > > FUD its just that i'd like to move the agenda beyond the
> >> > vision. Even
> >> > > providing a very basic infrastructure and basic
> >> > scenario/data i think
> >> > > you under estimate the work involved and more importantly i
> >> > think we
> >> > > run the risk of going where others have gone before?
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foss4g2009 mailing list
> > Foss4g2009 at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2009
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2009/attachments/20081107/a39e9b09/attachment.html