[geomoose-psc] OSGeo project officer

Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
Thu Apr 11 20:56:51 PDT 2013


I passed on the voting results.

Thanks all !!

bobb


________________________________
From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] on behalf of Eli Adam [eadam at co.lincoln.or.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:17 PM
To: Jim Klassen
Cc: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [geomoose-psc] OSGeo project officer


Motion passes.

Bob, can you take it from here?

Eli

On Apr 11, 2013 5:48 PM, "James Klassen" <klassen.js at gmail.com<mailto:klassen.js at gmail.com>> wrote:

+1 anyone but me.

On Apr 11, 2013 6:14 PM, "Brent Fraser" <bfraser at geoanalytic.com<mailto:bfraser at geoanalytic.com>> wrote:
+1 Bobb!

Best Regards,
Brent Fraser

On 4/11/2013 2:54 PM, Eli Adam wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
<bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us<mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>> wrote:
Eli (and others),

I thought that happened afterwards, not before.  I did see it on the list.  I remember some time back nominating myself for this, but if someone else wants to take it on, fine by me.  I'm officially throwing my name out there for consideration.
+1 to Bobb

I'm a little unclear about what the duties entail as well.  Is it purely a liaison to OSGeo, or ??  I can't seem to find a list of these project officers anywhere (easily)
My understanding is that if the Board wants to know something of the
project, then you have to respond.

Eli

Bobb



  -----Original Message-----
  From: geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> [mailto:geomoose-psc-<mailto:geomoose-psc->
  bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:bounces at lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Eli Adam
  Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:35 PM
  To: geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
  Subject: [geomoose-psc] OSGeo project officer

  PSC,

  The Board did not vote on confirming GeoMoose graduation since we
  did not come out of Incubation with a Project officer.
  http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2013-April/002170.html
  http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/incubator/2013-March/002095.html

  I believe that the Incubation Committee will need to amend/pass
  another motion including the project officer.  We should
  determine a project officer and get that to the Incubation
  committee.

  Eli
  _______________________________________________
  geomoose-psc mailing list
  geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
  http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc



_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

_______________________________________________
geomoose-psc mailing list
geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org>
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20130412/82ace036/attachment.html>


More information about the geomoose-psc mailing list