[PROJ] robots.txt

Javier Jimenez Shaw j1 at jimenezshaw.com
Fri Sep 20 06:31:04 PDT 2024


On Fri, 20 Sept 2024 at 14:43, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

>
> Le 20/09/2024 à 13:57, Javier Jimenez Shaw a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Sept 2024 at 22:06, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Javier,
>>
>>
>> Should we do the same in PROJ as in GDAL?
>>
>>
>> Seems a good idea. What should we index for PROJ: /en/latest/ or
>> /en/stable/ ?
>>
> What is the difference between latest and stable?
> For a moment I thought that latest was from "master", and stable the "last
> release". But there are changes from
> https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/4251 that are not in latest.
>
> yes, "RTD latest" = "git master" and "RTD stable" = "last git tag"
>
> Comparing the commit history of https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/commits/9.5/
> (the branch) and https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/commits/9.5.0 (the tag) I
> now understand why RTD stable == tag 9.5.0 currently doesn't display the
> 9.5.0 release. The reason is that it lacks the commit
> https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/commit/1960849ba7b65f05c13e10cac233e021a3e045dd
> "Update docs for 9.5.0 release".
>
> So this is mostly a matter of adjusting the release procedure to make sure
> the tag incorporates the download link for it (at that point the release
> tarball is not yet generated, but its name and location are entirely
> predictable) and the updated news.
>
> We could for example tag commit 1960849ba7b65f05c13e10cac233e021a3e045dd
> as "9.5.0-updated-doc" and that would do, but there might be side effects
> in doing that (like all distributions automatically tracking tags that
> would trigger new build).
>
> I'm wondering if a simpler and more desirable behavior would be to manage
> to convince RTD to alias "stable" to the "9.5" branch currently, so stable
> receives backported doc fixes, etc. That would be surprising that the RTD
> configuration doesn't allow to do that.
>
>
Does it explain why "latest" documentation does not include the typos
corrected in the PR 4251, already merged into master?

-- http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20240920/9758c573/attachment.htm>


More information about the PROJ mailing list