[PROJ] robots.txt

[Javier Jimenez Shaw]

Coming back to the question about
"What should we index for PROJ: /en/latest/ or /en/stable/ ?"

Now that I have clear what is what, I would say that robots.txt should
include only "en/stable"
IIRC, gdal has "latest" because at that point in time (and today as well)
there is no stable available yet, only latest.

BTW, is there any reason why in GDAL the "Read the Docs" menu is on the
right, and not in the left as in PROJ? (I prefer as in PROJ)

Cheers.
Javier

On Fri, 20 Sept 2024 at 15:40, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Does it explain why "latest" documentation does not include the typos
> corrected in the PR 4251, already merged into master?
>
> Ah, well, this is due to the merging of
> https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/4249, which is a commit to honour [ci
> skip] for RTD. But as that commit is the last one in master currently, and
> it does include "[ci skip]" in its commit message, well, the doc didn't get
> rebuilt as expected :-)
>
> I've just pushed a dummy commit to trigger a rebuild:
> https://app.readthedocs.org/projects/osgeo-proj/builds/25693188/
>
>
> -- http://www.spatialys.com
>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>>
>> -- http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/proj/attachments/20240920/f35bffac/attachment.htm>