[QGIS-Developer] What to do about WFS test failures?

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi all,
I very much think that the WFS client is an really bad state, and is not
really reliable, especially in WFS-T context.
The good news is that we just have been funded to refactor it !
The work should start in september and land in 3.6. I will let our dev's
come here with more technical details about the goals. I hope we will also
be able to take benefit of this to this the OGC compliancy of the client
here.
Best regards,
Régis

Le lun. 3 sept. 2018 à 11:36, Tom Chadwin <tom.chadwin at nnpa.org.uk> a
écrit :

> I can't offer any helpful suggestions, but just to let you know I finally
> had
> to disable all my plugin WFS tests. I used to cope, by rerunning failed
> Travis runs, but by about three months ago, it seemed no longer usable -
> failure after failure.
>
> I was using a third-party WFS, and perhaps I could have got round this by
> adding a WFS provider to the test docker image, but in this plugin's case,
> I
> didn't think it worth the significant effort to do so. The WM(T)S tests
> also
> use third-party sources and seem stable, so perhaps this wasn't the
> underlying issue anyway.
>
> If an improvement or solution could be found, it would be great to
> reinstate
> these tests.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> -----
> Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon
> --
> Sent from:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20180903/944ad185/attachment-0001.html>