[QGIS-Developer] stale bot :-(

[Matthias Kuhn]

This one slipped through the cracks of a notoriously understaffed pull
request review team. Sorry for that. I just reopened it, since it looks
reasonable.
If you run into this again, please ask what can be done to continue with
the pull request, a comment will show your interest, likely attract
reviewers - and also snooze the stale bot.

Matthias

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:59 PM Ian Turton <ijturton at gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually it was the PR itself that was closed -
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/39231
>
> Ian
>
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 14:54, Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Can you share a link to this issue?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Matthias
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ian Turton <ijturton at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That's odd to hear as I had one marked stale that had a PR attached
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 10:03, Matthias Kuhn <matthias at opengis.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Richard,
>>>>
>>>> Sorry if it was a bit a rough start!
>>>> The stale bot specifically picks only issues which are left with the
>>>> "feedback" label.
>>>> This was the case with these two issues. I notice Giovanni already
>>>> fixed this.
>>>>
>>>> The assumption is that the veggies don't have open questions on them
>>>> and this way we can filter the weed. Does that sound reasonable to you?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:38 AM Richard Duivenvoorde <
>>>> rdmailings at duif.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I received some "this issue will be closed because of lack of
>>>>> feedback",
>>>>> but I think current 'stale bot implementation' is a little rude on the
>>>>> edges.
>>>>>
>>>>> (did I miss some discussion about this here?)
>>>>>
>>>>> I received some "this issue will be closed because of lack of
>>>>> feedback", only because I commented on them. But some are just plain valid:
>>>>>
>>>>> As an example:
>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/39107#issuecomment-749298135
>>>>> that is just a valid use-case (or maybe feature request?)
>>>>>
>>>>> This one:
>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/37984
>>>>> is just valid (I even installed Oracle to check this...)
>>>>>
>>>>> This one: also valid and still needed:
>>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/37956
>>>>>
>>>>> Weeding the issues is not nice, so removing non-valid, old or non
>>>>> responding is fine, but now I think the bot is pulling the veggies instead
>>>>> of the weed :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>>>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ian Turton
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Ian Turton
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20201222/e8b8b3d2/attachment-0001.html>