[QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS webserver size vs publishing old docs

Matthias Kuhn matthias at opengis.ch
Mon Mar 20 09:21:07 PDT 2023


Hi all,

before we all spend too much energy and time on this, would simply buying
more space for that also be a (probably not even that expensive) option?

Matthias

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 5:16 PM Andreas Neumann via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I agree with Johannes - that old docs - at least of LTR versions should
> ideally be kept around for more years.
>
> I wonder what is the content of "QGIS-tests" (the largest share storage
> wise)? Is this the "latest" documentation version in the works - or is it
> the test results of the performance tests? Does it contain old stuff that
> could be cleaned?
>
> Andreas
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 12:22, DelazJ via QGIS-PSC <
> qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi all (and sorry for the cross-post)
>>
>> Richard has raised the issue a couple of times with no specific
>> feedback/decision but I think now we NEED to go forward : there is not
>> enough space on our servers to store everything we want to share.
>> Yesterday, I updated the docs infrastructure to serve translated versions
>> of the 3.28 documentation but they are not published this morning, probably
>> because of lack of space to get them pasted.
>>
>> # du -hs *
>> 255M    doc-test
>> 579M    QGIS-Documentation
>> 7.2G    QGIS-Documentation-2.14
>> 6.3G    QGIS-Documentation-2.18
>> 7.7G    QGIS-Documentation-2.8
>> 12G     QGIS-Documentation-3.10
>> 11G     QGIS-Documentation-3.16
>> 9.4G    QGIS-Documentation-3.22
>> 579M    QGIS-Documentation-3.28
>> 8.0G    QGIS-Documentation-3.4
>> 31G     QGIS-tests
>> 16G     QGIS-Website
>>
>> An option could be to rent a bigger  webserver but a few
>> questions/suggestions so far (I'm only speaking for the docs as I don't
>> know what is behind other folders):
>> - Do we need to serve all these versions? FYI we recently silently
>> removed and redirected <2.8 docs (and nobody complained) so we could
>> probably be more "aggressive"
>> - It could be nice to define some strategy on this area: e.g. we keep
>> publishing master, current LTR, previous LTR and any older URL is
>> redirected to current LTR --> meaning that today we would be serving only
>> testing in English, 3.28 and 3.22 in English + translations. OR one more
>> older LTR (ie 3.16)?
>>
>> PS: this issue somehow also affects the PyQGIS documentation repo [0],
>> due to github-pages size limits
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harrissou
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/qgis/pyqgis/issues/104#issuecomment-1354338491
>> _______________________________________________
>> QGIS-PSC mailing list
>> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>

-- 
 
<https://www.opengis.ch/2022/11/03/best-of-swiss-enterprise-app-award-for-qfield/>

Best of Swiss Enterprise App-Award for QField 
<https://www.opengis.ch/2022/11/03/best-of-swiss-enterprise-app-award-for-qfield/> 
- Hold the power of QGIS in your hand - get it now <https://qfield.org/get>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20230320/02bc3e4a/attachment.htm>


More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list