[QGIS-Developer] Experimental flag

[Paolo Tormene]

Thank you very much!
I've just re-uploaded version 3.24.0 (experimental) and the interface shows
correctly the flask icon, so the issue was in fact fixed.
Best regards,
Paolo

On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 8:38 AM Lova Andriarimalala <lova at kartoza.com>
wrote:

> Dear Paolo,
>
> Thank you very much for reporting this.
>
> The experimental checkbox in the upload and new version form has been
> removed, as discussed in the issue at
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Plugins-Website/issues/71. However, it
> appeared that the new version form was not handling the experimental
> attribute correctly. A new fix has been submitted to address this issue:
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Plugins-Website/pull/99.
>
> Uploading a new version as experimental should now work correctly using
> the same workflow.
>
> Best regards,
> Lova Andriarimalala
>
>
> *QGIS Full Stack Developer   *
> *T *: +27(0) 87 809 2702          *E *: lova at kartoza.com          *W* :
> kartoza.com
>
>
>
> *This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for
> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you *
> *have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying*
> *of the contents is prohibited.*
>
>
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 16:06, Paolo Tormene via QGIS-Developer <
> qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> P.S.: I see version 3.24.0 has now been approved, without the
>> experimental flag. I have to delete it, before any user accidentally
>> downloads it believing it is "stable".
>> Please let me know how to proceed in order to re-upload the same version
>> as experimental.
>> Thanks again,
>> Paolo
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Paolo Tormene <
>> paolo.tormene at globalquakemodel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello. I have a question about the management of the "experimental" flag
>>> in a newly uploaded plugin version. In metadata.txt in this case I have
>>> experimental=True. However, in
>>> https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/svir/#plugin-versions in the row
>>> corresponding to the new version 3.24.0 I don't see the expected symbol of
>>> the flask. I noticed that, with respect to the past, in the form used to
>>> upload a new plugin version now there is no checkbox to specify if the
>>> version is experimental or not. I supposed it would have been extracted
>>> from the metadata, but it looks like that flag was ignored.
>>> Please, may you check about this and possibly suggest to me how to
>>> proceed in case the uploading workflow has changed?
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
>>>
>>> *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk
>>>
>>> *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -*
>>> @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld
>>> <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882
>>
>> *GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk
>>
>> *GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -*
>> @GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld
>> <http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>

-- 

*PAOLO TORMENE* senior software developer +39 0382 5169882

*GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE MODEL * working together to assess risk

*GEM -* globalquakemodel.org <http://www.globalquakemodel.org> *T -*
@GEMwrld <http://twitter.com/GEMwrld> *F -* GEMwrld
<http://www.facebook.com/GEMwrld>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20250411/6b17ffb8/attachment.htm>