[Qgis-user] topological editing don't works as expected

Thu Oct 18 05:18:53 PDT 2018

Hi Harrissou,
as others said, the snapping and toplogical edition area is a really
complex part of the code. Currently, developpers that start to fix bugs
will have serious doubts when trying to tackle things that are far away
from their area of knowledge. The current bug triage work is not going so
far in adressing priorities.
I really agree with you the new digitizing tools need some love a lot. I
felle particularly concerned since I was involved in the new node tool work
as a tester, and I warned a few times last year that we faced a major
change that needed a lot of user feedback.
I think this is a perfect opportunity to work with the PSC on raising
"Must-be-fixed" issues. I think Andreas already took the action to ask the
concerned developpers to get involved. Many thanks for that.
Cheers
Régis

Le jeu. 18 oct. 2018 à 10:15, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Régis,
>
> The issue priority is already set as high, tagged as a regression,
> mentioned (and argumented) in the QEP related to the vertex tool. We are in
> bug fixing time. What is missing? An interested dev?
>
> IMO, the vertex tool refactoring brings nice features but having used it
> more and more these last days, I find that we lose lot of handy features
> and working with it in master is not that straightforward. And this has
> nothing to do with changing habits.
> I'm afraid that releasing 3.4 LTR with these issues (topology, vertex
> editor, adding simply a vertex on an existing segment...) would not help
> people that do daily digitizing work. Just my opinion.
>
> Regards,
> Harrissou
>
> Le jeu. 18 oct. 2018 à 09:54, Régis Haubourg <regis.haubourg at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Well, we can raise its priority and call developpers that are funded
>> currently byt QGIS.org to work on it.
>> Régis
>>
>> Le jeu. 18 oct. 2018 à 08:40, Alexandre Neto <senhor.neto at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Well, if there's a ticket already, there's not much more we can do.
>>> Unless someone is willing to sponsor that work/fix.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Alexandre Neto
>>>
>>> A qui, 18/10/2018, 05:57, Antongeo76 <antoviscomi at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>
>>>> Alexandre Neto wrote
>>>> > I can confirm that adding a new vertex to a polygon does not create
>>>> > vertexes on other other polygons.
>>>> >
>>>> > You need to create a node on the other polygon, and then snap it to
>>>> the
>>>> > first. Only then the topological node move work on both polygons.
>>>> >
>>>> > Not sure how it worked on 2.18, may be considered a regression.
>>>> >
>>>> > Alexandre Neto
>>>> >
>>>> > A qua, 17/10/2018, 10:30, Antongeo76 <
>>>>
>>>> > antoviscomi@
>>>>
>>>> > > escreveu:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Hi all,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> in QGIS 3.2.3 as in MASTER
>>>> >> I need to edit a polygon shapefile with topological editing active
>>>> >> -I set snap options with tolerance 1m to my layer
>>>> >> -I active topologica editing an spapping on intersection
>>>> >> -I try  to add a vertex on a polygon and move it for adjust boundary
>>>> >>
>>>> >> well
>>>> >> -the vertex is added only on one of two coincident polygon boundary
>>>> >> -then when I try to move the added vertex this reshape only one of
>>>> two
>>>> >> polygon...
>>>> >>       I expected that topological editing still works as in QGIS 2,
>>>> >>       where when I add a vertex and move it the reshaping acts on
>>>> both
>>>> >> polygon who share the boundary I
>>>> >>       want to reshape
>>>> >>
>>>> >> there is someone else that has noticed the same anomaly
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Antonio
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> -----
>>>> >> Antonio
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Sent from:
>>>> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-User-f4125267.html
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Qgis-user mailing list
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> > Qgis-user at .osgeo
>>>>
>>>> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>>> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Alexandre Neto
>>>> > ---------------------
>>>> > @AlexNetoGeo
>>>> > http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
>>>> > http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Qgis-user mailing list
>>>>
>>>> > Qgis-user at .osgeo
>>>>
>>>> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>>>
>>>> In 2.18 adding a vertex on a shared boundary,
>>>> This vertex becomes automatically shared too
>>>> There is a ticked on qgis issues
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.qgis.org/issues/18046
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Antonio
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-User-f4125267.html
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-user mailing list
>>>> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alexandre Neto
>>> ---------------------
>>> @AlexNetoGeo
>>> http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
>>> http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-user mailing list
>>> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-user mailing list
>> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20181018/a1b759fa/attachment.html>