[OSGeo-Standards] [RESTful-Policy.SWG] [OAB] Encodings and REST

xavier lhomme lhomme.xavier at gmail.com
Mon Oct 22 12:35:58 PDT 2012


Sure reviewing Geoservices specification takes time but you could also
experimenting it !
Le 22 oct. 2012 17:13, "Andrea Aime" <andrea.aime at geo-solutions.it> a
écrit :

> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Raj Singh <rsingh at opengeospatial.org>wrote:
>
>> Still, I'd challenge the OSGeo community to think hard about how many
>> hours they devote to standards vs. how many hours they devote to code
>> development, and ask yourself if the sweat equity for standards has matched
>> the sweat equity you expect from developers. I know those writing on this
>> thread are an exception, but in general I've found it difficult to get
>> specs reviewed or critiqued by this list. For example, I put out multiple
>> requests on this mailing list earlier this year for participation in
>> reviewing the WMTS specification for a potential major reworking that could
>> have unified TMS and WMTS, and I had no response from anyone.
>>
>
> Raj, about this, I know I wanted to review some of specs presented but the
> time allowed was too short
> for someone that is as booked as I am.
> It seems to me the spec closed development goes on for a long time, would
> it be possible to
> get a couple of months of open comments?
> I know it seems a lot, but it also takes a good full day to just give a
> cursory look at the non
> trivial specs (the REST services one is an exception in a bad way, so
> large that to read and
> understand it all it would take a few days).
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> --
> ==
> Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more
> information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39  339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Standards at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20121022/c5404ba0/attachment.html>


More information about the Standards mailing list